The Possible Bodies Inventory : dis-orientation and its aftermath

Jara Rocha, Femke Snelting


Following Sara Ahmed’s invitation “to think how queer politics might involve disorientation, without legislating disorientation as a politics”, the collective enquiry Possible Bodies research team inventoried three items related to 3D artifacts, following  through  the implications of the contemporary renderings of “dis-orientation” they invoke. Each in their own way, the items relate to a world that is becoming oblique, where inside and outside, up and down are switching places and where new perspectives become available. They speak of the mutual constitution of technology and bodies, of matter and semiotics, of nature and culture and how orientation and the subjectivities that emerge from it are managed across the technocolonial matrix of representation in turbo-capitalism. The three items allow for a look at tools that represent, track and model “bodies” through diverse cultural means of abstraction, and eventually convoke their aftermath in a call for “disobedient action-research”.

Texto completo:



-Ahmed, S., 2006. Queer Phenomenology. Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press

-Barad, K., 2012, Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns and remembers. In: R. Dolphijn, I. Van der Tuin, eds. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

-Copeland, R., 2004. Merce Cunningham: The Modernizing of Modern Dance. New York: Routledge.

-Cunningham, M., n.d. An Interview on R. Buckminster Fuller and Black Mountain College, [online] Available at: [Accessed March 2017].

-Fisher, G. L., 2014. Blender 3D Basics Beginner’s Guide. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.

-Haraway, D., 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575-599.

-The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In: L. Grossberg, L, C. Nelson, C. and P. Treichler, eds. 1992. Cultural Studies. New York/London: Routledge.

-Harding, S., 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Available online at: [Accessed March 2017].

-Portanova, S., 2013. Moving Without a body. Cambridge: MIT Press.

-Preciado, P. B., 2008, Pharmaco-pornographic Politics: Towards a New Gender Ecology. Parallax, 14(1), pp. 105-117. Available online at: [Accessed March 2017].

-Rocha, J., 2016. Testing texting South: a political fiction. Machine Research website [online] Available online at: / [Accessed May 2017].

-nelting, F., and Rocha, J., 2017. MakeHuman. In: R. Braidotti, et al., eds. 2017. The Posthuman Glossary. London: Bloomsbury Academic (forthcoming).

-Stengers, I., 2013. Une culture du dépaysement. Hermès, La Revue, 67 (3), p. 201.

-Steyeri, H., 2011. In Free Fall: A Thought Experiment on Vertical Perspective. E-flux journal, [online] Available at: [Accessed March 2017].

-_______, 2012. Ripping reality: Blind spots and wrecked data in 3D, [online]. Website of the EIPCP (European Institute for Progressive Cultural Politics). Available at: [Accessed March 2017].

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.

ISSN: 2462-5892


Inmaterial. Diseño, arte y sociedad


BAU, Centro Universitario de Diseño
Telf.: +34 93 415 34 74